In-depth technology research: finding new ways to recover data, accessing firmware, writing programs, reading bits off the platter, recovering data from dust.
Forum rules
Please
do not post questions about data recovery cases here (use
this forum instead). This forum is for topics on finding new ways to recover data. Accessing firmware, writing programs, reading bits off the platter, recovering data from dust...
October 13th, 2010, 6:35
pinoy wrote:helpdisc wrote:Hobbyist = amateur=fucked drive
You guys (helpdisc & hdrc) might have the good/best professional tool on offer..... but..
Your attitudes in the public forum totally stink and are quite childish! It makes people re-think who they are dealing with!!!
Grow up. Perhaps both of you should purchase the DUMMY GUIDE book on PROFESSIONAL BEHAVIOUR for company/business owners.
this is completely your opinion, but I know from personal experience that HDRC = poorly manufactured tools, and Helpdisc = great tool of quality design. I make more success on difficult cases using tools from Helpdisc than I did with simple cases using HDRC tools.
And while this thread may have changed your opinion of the people here, the tools remain capable of defending themselves.
So quality tool vs cheap inexpensive tool....
October 13th, 2010, 19:50
If you read the whole thread, my opinion and experience of the helpdisc and hdrc tool is quite clear.
What I raised is nothing to do with the tools but rather the conduct/attitudes/language of the manufacturers.
Is this how they speak/conduct/relate/compose/sell themselves to their potential customers/partners in their labs/shop/seminars?
Who is denying the tool won't speak for itself? Off course it will. I am quite in a privileged position to have
access to these tools (hdrc/helpdisc), and others not mentioned. I have told of my experience of them in the first page of this thread.
Anyway, enough said on this way out of topic discussions. sorry for the out of topic contributions.
rip.
November 9th, 2010, 22:46
Spend some time on google patents reveals too many such tools (many almost identical in design, shape, etc to those discussed here). As far as plastic versus metal, etc. One such patenet by Western Digital which is only a few years old, suggests preference to plastic and sites the reasons why as well. There are so many such head combs and even some that serve dual purposes as well.
November 10th, 2010, 3:25
If You wach bouth tools, You will see that on one You do not have problems with rotating and the other one has. The other that has, have problem with friction. Friction couses problem with heith, heith problem couses contact with platters...and You know where it leads.
If we put a side who made it first ( wich I already did, and who has a patent on specific desing, wich will be a legal question....) there is a problem how fast and good can You make them.
We had few copy cats, nobady made it to serial production. We even have problems.
Plastic tools can not be used on 7200.10 or 8 or 7 on samsung tools etc etc etc...
DIY and hobby are making a lot of peopple datafree.
Imagine that surgernt had a skalpel for hobbist.
Sorry for my bad english.
November 19th, 2010, 10:57
Haha Hdrc, you wish that I was a sales person... Luckily I showed the garbage you call tools there too.
hdrc wrote:Definetily as the market is totaly diffrent ....as we have to VOTE and honour thease type of peoples as not being from this data recovery world but thease type of persons are countable being as honurable as more than 1000 threads and being as a saler of some another industry...please check the link from this honarable member
http://www.amazon.com/Sex-Dummies-Dr-Ru ... -1-catcorrPlease think...
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.