craig6928 wrote:
ck first thing is that your not very professional in this type of business
and your acting like a little kid
come back when you know more about the data recovery field
deepspar will get killed of by the atola insight when it release later on
better specs and does a lot more then any other recovery machines on the market
you more likely work for deepspar themself

Posts like these deserve a ban imho. Making an absurd thread is one thing, but insulting another member when he has done nothing to insult you is another. You clearly have absolutely no experience or knowledge about the field so don't try to pretend like you do. You have made plenty of posts on this forum showing your utter incompetence.
You are trying to compare two unrelated products. Imaging takes by far the longest out of any other procedure so you will need separate imaging tools from firmware repair tools. Last time I saw a rumored price for the Atola Insight it was 6,000... The deepspar is 3000-4000. Buying multiple atola insights just for imaging is not economical in any way you look at it. Also, the atola insight is limited to 30mb/s when imaging (i think that is what the YEC website said, I am not too certain however), which puts it behind the deepspar unit right away (for imaging purposes). It would only be somewhat interesting if it could image by heads, like the data extractor... If it can, and it is as configurable and quick at error handling as the deepspar unit then it might find a place in my lab, but otherwise... not for imaging.
You should be comparing your beloved Atola Insight (which no one has seen yet) to PC-3000 + Data extractor; at least you would be comparing it to related tools... Or even better the new portable (which no one has seen yet either I don' t think).
And yes Craig, I work for deepspar too. Along with all the people trying to give you honest advice in the other thread
