Switch to full style
Buy/sell hard drives, parts, tools
Post a reply

...and the drives I am seeing the most in for recovery...

January 2nd, 2008, 15:35

.... are Seagate.

Especially those manufactured after mid-2007, with larger capacities. (3.5" drives.)

Bearing seizure, head failures - only two years ago Seagate used to be the most reliable. Now I see more of those than WD and original Maxtor put together.

Anyone else have some comments?

Re: ...and the drives I am seeing the most in for recovery...

January 3rd, 2008, 4:55

I have seen that as well. I have received a lot of Seagate from 320 to 750 Gb with damaged heads, bearing and even head crashes.

Re: ...and the drives I am seeing the most in for recovery...

January 3rd, 2008, 5:30

Same for me; lots of seagates, mostly with bearing problems.

Dobre

Re: ...and the drives I am seeing the most in for recovery...

January 3rd, 2008, 6:26

Are the labels plain white or do they have a green line around the outside?

Re: ...and the drives I am seeing the most in for recovery...

January 3rd, 2008, 10:09

No green line / RMA drives seen recently - only originals.

Re: ...and the drives I am seeing the most in for recovery...

January 11th, 2008, 14:47

Same here Seagate , there is a reason why seagate are seen much in cases because they sold most unlike WD and Maxtor .

Re: ...and the drives I am seeing the most in for recovery...

January 13th, 2008, 5:06

rameez wrote:Same here Seagate , there is a reason why seagate are seen much in cases because they sold most unlike WD and Maxtor .


I doubt it, Rameez.

Even if Seagate sold three times as many drives as WD and the old Maxtor, I'm still seeing more than three Seagates for every WD / Maxtor that comes in.

Also, because they are almost all displaying the same problem, this leads me to believe they are having production / design problems.

Get manufacturing out of China, charge the end user an extra $2 per drive - problem solved.


Duncan
Post a reply