February 26th, 2010, 21:33
March 2nd, 2010, 22:46
March 10th, 2010, 7:22
March 16th, 2010, 12:46
CK wrote:Well.....finally got my greasy hands on a shiny new Atola Imager.
Have it up and running in our lab now and I have imaged a few drives with it. Still learning the ropes but I'll provide you with my honest opinion of the unit in the next couple of weeks.
I've been a loyal Deepspar customer but thought it was worth a shot seeing as it is so reasonably priced.
Watch this space..............
March 17th, 2010, 10:16
March 17th, 2010, 13:34
lcoughey wrote:I've landed my hands on an Atola Imager. I'm currently working on a comparison chart between DeepSpar Disk Imager, Atola Imager (Ethernet) and DD_Rescue. I'm not making any promises, but should have a reasonably educated opinion within the next few days. If anyone has any questions about specific features, PM me and I will be sure to add them to my list of things to test.
March 18th, 2010, 11:22
March 18th, 2010, 11:38
March 18th, 2010, 12:04
drc wrote:Thanks for the writeup, Luke.
IMHO not having the ability to create and use head maps is going to put anyone way behind the curve these days
March 18th, 2010, 12:31
March 18th, 2010, 12:52
March 18th, 2010, 13:04
Starling wrote:That's what he's saying
March 18th, 2010, 13:06
drc wrote:Starling wrote:That's what he's saying
Yeah. Sorry, I meant that if you don't have the ability to image by heads then you are going to be way behind everyone else
March 18th, 2010, 16:30
March 19th, 2010, 6:13
March 19th, 2010, 8:09
CK wrote:Hi Luke,
I agree with your findings, I haven't had much time to compile mine like the way you have.
What I miss most with Atola is the ability to jump x number of sectors. I find that DDI has far more control over the drive.
Also, if you pause the imaging process, it automatically turns off the destination drive - I find this very annoying.
Bear in mind that Atola is quite new on the scene and improvements are being made to it all the time (head map/selective head imaging). With the right feedback and suggestions, it will improve.
March 20th, 2010, 6:48
lcoughey wrote:...
At the very least, give external access to the KVM and let the user work with the unit directly
instead of having to use another system to connect to it via ethernet.
March 23rd, 2010, 9:17
lcoughey wrote:CK wrote:Hi Luke,
I agree with your findings, I haven't had much time to compile mine like the way you have.
What I miss most with Atola is the ability to jump x number of sectors. I find that DDI has far more control over the drive.
Also, if you pause the imaging process, it automatically turns off the destination drive - I find this very annoying.
Bear in mind that Atola is quite new on the scene and improvements are being made to it all the time (head map/selective head imaging). With the right feedback and suggestions, it will improve.
Excellent points, I forgot to add the jump feature and comment on the power off issue. I also noticed yesterday afternoon when playing with a drive with a lot of media damage at the 60% mark that all the Atola Imager does is narrows in on those sectors, but other than a longer read timeout, it doesn't (can't) manipulate how the drive reads those sectors. It would be nice to drop down to PIO mode or tell the drive to read the sectors, ignoring ECC. Instead, it just reports a UNC error, gives up and moves on.
Don't get me wrong, in most cases, missing a few thousand sectors is fine. However, when it comes to a client's Quickbooks database, every sector is critical. I think that Atola certainly has potential, but I'm not sure that it is ready to consider itself a true competitor to DeepSpar on the imaging front.
Realistically speaking, I'm not sure what the hardware is needed for. Under the hood, it is just a standard system board booting into Linux. At the very least, give external access to the KVM and let the user work with the unit directly instead of having to use another system to connect to it via ethernet.
March 23rd, 2010, 9:27
March 25th, 2010, 2:27
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.