craig6928 wrote:
it makes you wonder why they want everyone to go over to these ssds crap
There are a number of good clear advantages to SSD drives. Speed is the most important one and the reason you should use an SSD for your O/S and APPLICATION drive. Spinners will never compete in this area. It is physically impossible.
I always recommend to have SSD as your base drive. And several big slow spinners for your data storage. There absolutely no reason to be able to have to load your mp3 or jpegs or avi files at SSD speeds. So therefore you can put these on the spinners.
There is every reason to put your O/S on the solids, the amount of disk thrashing, moving the heads back and forth thousands of times to load an application, all those tiny windows files, libraries, drivers, and dll modules, it's just a big bottleneck. One that SSD solves nicely.
As for securely erasing an SSD. An encrypting drive is the best, and will show no loss of performance. Just don't expect data recovery to be easy on this type of drive. But then again, you're the smart user and run regularly scheduled backups. Kill the encryption key, kill the data.
OHH WAIT.. I thought we weren't putting user data on these SSD's ?? So in a proper system, data recovery ops is non-issue, and if you backup your spinners, it's also a non-issue.
Personally, and don't tell anyone, I don't think SSD's are ready for prime-time. Especially when the likes of Kingston advertises 3000 p/e as a major advantage! Give it another 2-3 years and then.. we'll see!