All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Switch to mobile style


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Mark slow sectors bad, or try to revitalize them?
PostPosted: July 15th, 2011, 3:42 
Offline

Joined: July 15th, 2011, 3:30
Posts: 2
Location: estonia
Is there any software that would automatically mark slow sectors (access time> 100ms) bad?

Or any software that would let me mark known sectors bad myself manually, for a Seagate hard disk? Didn't notice this kind of functionality in Seatools (either Win or DOS).

OR, software that would try to exercise those slow sectors with magnetically opposed patterns?

My disk has 5 sectors > 150ms and 1 > 500ms (shown by HDDSCAN) and those are just waiting to go bad, i'd rather save myself the trouble.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mark slow sectors bad, or try to revitalize them?
PostPosted: July 16th, 2011, 4:28 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: September 8th, 2009, 18:21
Posts: 14946
Location: Australia
I haven't tried this (Makebad), but it may be what you are looking for:

makebad-new-utility-avoid-weak-red-brown-sector-t6538.html

http://files.hddguru.com/download/Software/Makebad/

_________________
A backup a day keeps DR away.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mark slow sectors bad, or try to revitalize them?
PostPosted: July 16th, 2011, 6:39 
Offline

Joined: July 15th, 2011, 3:30
Posts: 2
Location: estonia
Thanks, but seems it only can mark sectors as UNC, relying on the OS to mark them bad clusters later (=disk will not look perfect on sector level). Will check if possible to do permanent reallocation with MHDD and even a manual list of slow sectors, if need be..

Annoying that Seatools considers 500ms+ sectors still perfectly good instead of giving an option to mark them bad already :x


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mark slow sectors bad, or try to revitalize them?
PostPosted: July 17th, 2011, 4:04 
Offline

Joined: July 18th, 2006, 3:05
Posts: 7537
Location: ITALY
It is IMPOSSIBLE to add defects to lists manually without knowing organization of firmware or how to do it / specialistic equipment. It is possible to 'make bad' and it is locked out BY FILE SYSTEM or make a soft error that is added to grown defect list later but it is just cosmetic.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group