September 12th, 2011, 22:47
September 12th, 2011, 23:19
September 13th, 2011, 10:41
Vulcan wrote:@crumb110:
Interesting question, but there's too little info for it to be worth me trying to reply yet, without much more detail - otherwise I (and other members here) would spend all our time saying things like: "If you mean A then try X; if you mean B then try Y; if you mean C then try Z but don't forget L, M & N"
Can you start by explaining (a) what exactly you're trying to achieve, in more detail than your single-line title, with some examples; (b) what software & techniques you've tried already; and (c) exactly how what you've tried already didn't achieve what you wanted.
(d) Please explain exactly what you mean by "damaged areas" - that isn't a well-defined term, and will mean different things to different readers. Sure I can guess, but if I'm wrong then, again, any explanation from me will just be a waste of time.
(e) Please explain why you would want to "recover" data from a disk, but ignoring "damaged areas" - you might have data that you want to recover, which is in a "damaged area". Hopefully your answers to the above questions will already explain this, but if you don't think they explain this point, can you answer it specifically?
(f) Finally, how familiar are you with the level of control which normal operating systems and applications have, over ATA disk error recovery?
There may be more clarification needed later, but hopefully your full, clear and complete answers to those initial questions will help to clarify the area of discussion for any members here who reply.
September 13th, 2011, 13:23
September 13th, 2011, 15:25
September 13th, 2011, 16:00
crumb110 wrote:Surely its possible to scan the full hdd for data and not attempt to recover from the bad areas / or at least not retry them if failed once
September 16th, 2011, 16:30
September 16th, 2011, 23:10
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.