Decebal wrote:
I reaally didn' t mean to disrespect in any way.
I didn't think you meant any disrespect.

Simply that you had found the problem (i.e. it is not a disk problem) and you weren't answering the earlier questions. That combination usually means that the person has decided to progress on their own, and the thread here is over.
I've already been helping several other people on an electronics board today, so I only have time to give brief comments here:
Decebal wrote:
This discussion is still open from my perspective
I don't understand what is still "open" for
this forum. Your test results have showed the problem is related to the system, not the disk (i.e. move the disk, then performance = OK). This is a disk forum. Perhaps you will get some suggestions here, but since other types of support (PC / Windows etc.) are off-topic, then you should probably use other sources of support, as I mentioned.

Decebal wrote:
- I dont have any other previous graphs for comparison and nothing unusual happened before that.( I would have mentioned it already)
Thanks but please remember that people here don't know you. We can't assume you would have said if something unusual had happened. In fact it is very common for new members requesting help
not to mention useful information until they are asked. Therefore people who reply often spend lots of time trying to carefully ask the best questions that they can ask, in the time available, in order to try to help someone who is requesting help.
Decebal wrote:
- Of course I repeated the benchmark several times before posting here and got similar results.(Btw I always repeat tests)
Thanks, but I did not ask if you got "similar results" - I asked if you got the
same shape. After your disk-swap results, I am now confident that you did not get the same shape each time with the WD disk, because that result means the disk is the problem. That is why I was asking that specific question. If the shape is only "similar" but not "the same", then this points more towards the system (i.e. outside the disk) as the cause - which we now know is the situation for you.

I was trying to help you to identify whether the disk or the system, was the likely cause. Of course you have now identified the cause is not the disk, but we did not know that you had another system available to you for disk swapping.

Decebal wrote:
- As for the full raw SMART data, I used CrystalDiskInfo to get that raw smart data and you can see it from the pictures at the bottom of this post.
Thanks. I see no problems reported for the WD drive, and slight signs of concerns with the Samsung. In order to prevent you being misled by any possible Samsung drive misbehaviour also causing throughput "spikes", I would
not use it for troubleshooting your current system problem, if I was working on this. It is like fault-finding using a faulty oscilloscope - it can be difficult to know whether your test equipment, or the system, is causing any problem that you think you are measuring.
There are many different troubleshooting approaches you could use for the PC problem. Since you say that you have already tried a different SATA cable, I would suggest you start by trying different motherboard SATA ports, and also look for Windows error messages in the system event log, which may give you a clue about what type of problem is happening. I can think of many different things to try, but I have run out of time for now. Perhaps others will help you with your PC problem, although since it is off-topic I suggest you don't expect it. As I said before, sincere good luck!