HDD Raw Copy and HDDScan disagree on number of bad sectors
Posted: May 11th, 2016, 17:43
Hi people,
I'm using two great tools from this site: HDDScan 3.3 and HDD Raw Copy 1.10
I'm currently in panic mode because one of my drives, a Western Digital Red WD20EFRX has defective sectors, and I'm unable to view its contents from Windows. Windows thinks it's a RAW disk and cannot mount it
I tried TestDisk 7.0, and it detected a good backup copy of the exFAT boot sector, but it's unable to copy it over the main boot sector. It gives me a "write error" and cannot continue.
But there's something I don't understand. When I run HDDScan in read or verify mode, it detects approximately 800 bad sectors (starting from sector 2048 onwards). Every time I run it it detects a different number of bad sectors (sometimes 790, sometimes 810, etc)
However, HDD Raw Copy Tool only detects a single bad sector (just sector 2048, nothing else), and the rest of the sectors are copied fine.
Why is that? Who is correct? Is HDDScan overreporting the number of bad sectors? Or is HDD Raw Copy underreporting them?
Who should I trust more? Who is lying and who is telling the truth!?
I'm using two great tools from this site: HDDScan 3.3 and HDD Raw Copy 1.10
I'm currently in panic mode because one of my drives, a Western Digital Red WD20EFRX has defective sectors, and I'm unable to view its contents from Windows. Windows thinks it's a RAW disk and cannot mount it
I tried TestDisk 7.0, and it detected a good backup copy of the exFAT boot sector, but it's unable to copy it over the main boot sector. It gives me a "write error" and cannot continue.
But there's something I don't understand. When I run HDDScan in read or verify mode, it detects approximately 800 bad sectors (starting from sector 2048 onwards). Every time I run it it detects a different number of bad sectors (sometimes 790, sometimes 810, etc)
However, HDD Raw Copy Tool only detects a single bad sector (just sector 2048, nothing else), and the rest of the sectors are copied fine.
Why is that? Who is correct? Is HDDScan overreporting the number of bad sectors? Or is HDD Raw Copy underreporting them?
Who should I trust more? Who is lying and who is telling the truth!?