June 17th, 2020, 7:56
June 17th, 2020, 7:58
June 17th, 2020, 9:22
Iurii wrote:What's new in version 8.1:
- Pausing imaging process in case of API call errors (when disk is disconnected etc.);
June 17th, 2020, 13:40
June 17th, 2020, 17:48
Iurii wrote:maximus, Problem solved in version 8.1. Please check and let us know.
June 18th, 2020, 8:57
lcoughey wrote:I've confirmed that while it does prompt to continue imaging after the source disappears, it does not compensate for the new drive path. So, you have to close the imaging process, reopen the drive in UFS with the new drive path, restart the imaging process to the same image, map and log file and continue on. It is doable, but not optimal.
The great thing about this new feature of UFS is that the imaging process is fully functional within the free demo. Rather than pay for hddsuperclone and DMDE, you could image a file, folder or used sectors with the UFS Pro Demo...and it works in Linux, Mac OS and Windows. Pony up for the license and then be able to have UFS save the files out, splitting the damaged files into a "!Bad Files" folder
That said, UFS imaging still doesn't have a way to go back and re-read blocks marked as bad. So, ddrescue and hddsuperclone still have the advantage for drives with lots of bad sectors.
June 18th, 2020, 12:15
Amarbir[CDR-Labs] wrote:
Are You Comparing UFS-Explorer To hddsuperclone ? For Cloning
June 18th, 2020, 12:55
DR-Kiev wrote:Amarbir[CDR-Labs] wrote:
Are You Comparing UFS-Explorer To hddsuperclone ? For Cloning
Why not? UFS made a great jump with clonning bad drives, for the SAS/SCSI drives you already dont need a pc3k-DE sas version for that.
June 18th, 2020, 16:30
Amarbir[CDR-Labs] wrote:DR-Kiev wrote:Amarbir[CDR-Labs] wrote:
Are You Comparing UFS-Explorer To hddsuperclone ? For Cloning
Why not? UFS made a great jump with clonning bad drives, for the SAS/SCSI drives you already dont need a pc3k-DE sas version for that.
Really ,
Have you played around with HDDSuperClone ? . Do you know what it can do and do you know all the parameters and tweaks it can play around with .You Seriously need to spend time with hddsuperclone ,HDDsuperclone works direct with drives too ,Does UFS Explorer do that ,It goes via OS ,HDDSuperclone Does That and More and So Much More ,SCSI/SAS Support Is Already in HDDsuperclone ,You need to see some example -> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXfHI8 ... QTQ/videos
Maximus " Your Interest Should Be to Enhance your tool ,show them in your thread ,why hddsuperclone is a real superclone .What will you gain by solving bugs of this tool ? . Nothing .I have tonns of drives that are solved ,you should work with me and improve this even further ,Over and out .DR Kiev : For that matter we need no tool to do anything ,When why do we all have them "Its to simplify work and make money " . The sysdev team is a set of brilliant programmers ,you are saying its a great tool with bad sectors ,So common proof it ,Lets see some videos
June 18th, 2020, 16:39
michael chiklis wrote:Wooow, seem to be very promising this update.
Very good job
Unfortunately i don't have Deepspar but i own MRT which all we hate due the way how File Explorer behavies when extracting files.
MRT can't separate properly BAD files from GOOD files becuse it drops the bads one all in single folder (without original folder structure).
This means that many files get renamed, so is near to impossible (very difficult) understanding from which folders are those coming from.
Is UFS able to separate good files from bad files and drop them in a folder (ex called DAMAGED) with original folder structure of source drive?
Will in future UFS support MRT as Deepspar?
MRT staff doesn't want to listen their customer, they will never fix this and other heavy bugs, especially in File Explorer.
It is very annoing that we can't generate a proper list of bad files to send to ours customer, maybe UFS staff can overcome easily to this very annoing mrt shortcoming.
I hope so
June 18th, 2020, 16:48
DR-Kiev wrote:Good news for you, MRT tool full support in UFS Pro already exist, in beta version. Same like for DeepSpar. Will come in next update (probably week or so)
June 18th, 2020, 17:15
lcoughey wrote:DR-Kiev wrote:Good news for you, MRT tool full support in UFS Pro already exist, in beta version. Same like for DeepSpar. Will come in next update (probably week or so)
It works really well. I hope to throw a blog or video together tomorrow showing it in action.
June 18th, 2020, 17:49
Amarbir[CDR-Labs] wrote:Maximus " Your Interest Should Be to Enhance your tool ,show them in your thread ,why hddsuperclone is a real superclone .What will you gain by solving bugs of this tool ? . Nothing .I have tonns of drives that are solved ,you should work with me and improve this even further ,Over and out .
June 19th, 2020, 10:22
June 19th, 2020, 10:26
alfarom wrote:How does UFS Explorer compare with DMDE when used with HDDSuperClone Pro? I think UFS is out of my price range but it would be nice to now how it stacks up..
June 19th, 2020, 20:45
DR-Kiev wrote:michael chiklis wrote:Wooow, seem to be very promising this update.
Very good job
Unfortunately i don't have Deepspar but i own MRT which all we hate due the way how File Explorer behavies when extracting files.
MRT can't separate properly BAD files from GOOD files becuse it drops the bads one all in single folder (without original folder structure).
This means that many files get renamed, so is near to impossible (very difficult) understanding from which folders are those coming from.
Is UFS able to separate good files from bad files and drop them in a folder (ex called DAMAGED) with original folder structure of source drive?
Will in future UFS support MRT as Deepspar?
MRT staff doesn't want to listen their customer, they will never fix this and other heavy bugs, especially in File Explorer.
It is very annoing that we can't generate a proper list of bad files to send to ours customer, maybe UFS staff can overcome easily to this very annoing mrt shortcoming.
I hope so
Good news for you, MRT tool full support in UFS Pro already exist, in beta version. Same like for DeepSpar. Will come in next update (probably week or so)
June 20th, 2020, 8:39
June 20th, 2020, 9:04
June 20th, 2020, 9:10
alfarom wrote:Good video. Might even encourage to go back to MRT Ultra again...
I wouldn't worry about your video making skills. 5 minutes on YouTube will show you up there with Martin Scorsese compared to some IT related content...
June 21st, 2020, 15:44
alfarom wrote:How does UFS Explorer compare with DMDE when used with HDDSuperClone Pro? I think UFS is out of my price range but it would be nice to now how it stacks up..
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.