BlackST wrote:
The use of PE tools is for safety plus speed. Other homegrown solutions could work as well, but are intrinsecally unsafe, especially for the data.
[b][u]Keep in mind that no advice here or everywhere should put a single bit of information at risk or even lead to injury or damage or further damage.
homegrown solutions can be unsafe, I do agree with you, but persistance, determination and constant improvements to your solutions and techniques, and the skill of the engineer all should be enough to secure the data. I did not get to where I am now by purchasing PE tools, and head combs. When I began doing Data Recovery there was nothing commercially available that could assist me. Anybody can perform a platterswap if they purchase the correct tools, and read enough information, but the real skill comes from developing your own tools and methods.
I would bet that most of the experienced DR technicians here have recovered many failed drives using homegrown solutions, and most likely are still using these solutions.
If I have a 90% success rate with a specific method, whether intrinsecally safe or not, then I think I will stick to it.
I work hard, and research lots, and constantly looking to better myelf and my DR team, and if homegrown solutions work for me with good success, then homegrown solutions it is
