April 2nd, 2018, 19:07
April 8th, 2018, 12:21
April 8th, 2018, 13:42
April 8th, 2018, 13:53
unknown wrote:If you have both you will be very happy and won't regret it.
April 9th, 2018, 7:08
pclab wrote:Go for PC3000. You won't regret it.
April 9th, 2018, 13:36
trumanhw wrote:
Is the MRT the incredible value it appears to be?
Is it a near equivalent to the PC-3000?
Or is it mediocre -- rivaling the PC-3000 only in complexity, exacerbated by manuals written in Chinglish?
April 9th, 2018, 13:43
Phaz wrote:trumanhw wrote:
Is the MRT the incredible value it appears to be?
Is it a near equivalent to the PC-3000?
Or is it mediocre -- rivaling the PC-3000 only in complexity, exacerbated by manuals written in Chinglish?
MRT is a pathetic and glitchy parody, IMHO. You don't even get what you pay for. It doesn't have the promised 4 PCI-E channels, the speed is lower than stated. Not to mention that you won't find the majority of the up-to-date data recovery functions.
April 9th, 2018, 14:00
April 9th, 2018, 15:27
April 9th, 2018, 19:09
lcoughey wrote:At this point in time, here are the reasons I'd suggest considering an MRT system:
1. You already have PC3000 and just looking for a cheap way to get more imaging channels and to handle some firmware issues that will help free up PC3000 channels
2. You are new to data recovery and are looking for an inexpensive way to get the ball rolling, but with the end goal of making enough money to afford PC3000
3. In reality, cost/channel for a hardware disk imager is only about $1000/channel
April 10th, 2018, 5:26
BGman wrote:unknown wrote:If you have both you will be very happy and won't regret it.
Or you can drink a bottle of vodka every day for about 5 years and won't regret it. Garantee .
April 11th, 2018, 3:15
unknown wrote:Do you have one?
April 23rd, 2018, 12:09
Phaz wrote:MRT is a pathetic and glitchy parody, IMHO. You don't even get what you pay for. It doesn't have the promised 4 PCI-E channels, the speed is lower than stated. Not to mention that you won't find the majority of the up-to-date data recovery functions.
April 24th, 2018, 13:21
lcoughey wrote:Phaz wrote:MRT is a pathetic and glitchy parody, IMHO. You don't even get what you pay for. It doesn't have the promised 4 PCI-E channels, the speed is lower than stated. Not to mention that you won't find the majority of the up-to-date data recovery functions.
Although there are plenty of things to jump on with MRT, I don't think that imaging speed is one of them. I've got 3 tasks cloning drive-to-drive 2TB Seagate DM drives, each task averaging at about 120MB/second, on the MRT Ultra, which isn't any different than the speeds I'm getting with my PC3000 Express.
April 24th, 2018, 13:40
Amarbir[CDR-Labs] wrote:Well,
i get 175+
April 27th, 2018, 2:38
April 27th, 2018, 6:11
pclab wrote:On PC3000, I could do it in about 30 min (it takes that much time because reading by terminal is a little slow and it involved the screw and unscrew of the bolts hehehhe).
April 27th, 2018, 9:45
jermy wrote:pclab wrote:On PC3000, I could do it in about 30 min (it takes that much time because reading by terminal is a little slow and it involved the screw and unscrew of the bolts hehehhe).
you should have done it using an external programmer in 30 "SECONDS"
April 27th, 2018, 15:40
Spildit wrote:pclab wrote:Hi
Just to state one thing:
Yesterday I had a case of a burned PCB of a Samsung HD253HJ (F3), and just need to do the simplest things that is read original rom by terminal and write on donor PCB.
After several attempts, I couldn't make it on MRT, it always gave me an error.
On PC3000, I could do it in about 30 min (it takes that much time because reading by terminal is a little slow and it involved the screw and unscrew of the bolts hehehhe).
You should had played in "Euromilhões" as well ... Are you sure your PCB was ... BURNED ? If so you were verly lucky to have terminal access to read ROM with PC-3000 or whatever other tool of choice ...
:lol: :lol: :lol:
May 1st, 2018, 1:53
jermy wrote:pclab wrote:On PC3000, I could do it in about 30 min (it takes that much time because reading by terminal is a little slow and it involved the screw and unscrew of the bolts hehehhe).
you should have done it using an external programmer in 30 "SECONDS"
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.