|
MYSTERY ON USB EXTERNAL HD
On a Windows XP Pro system, I have a problem with a single USB ext HD enclosure and/or its HD. All other enclosures of the same model used on this system have no problems connecting to, or functioning with the system.
1. When a USB data cable is inserted into this USB enclosure, the Windows XP Pro system brings up a USB icon in the tray area, but recognizes only a drive letter from Windows Explorer / My Computer. Windows Explorer believes the USB ext HD is not formatted.
2. Not only that, but increasingly often, the system will not recognize the USB ext HD enclosure after data cable is inserted. On such occasions, no USB icon appears in the tray area and no drive letter appears in Windows Explorer. However, after data cable insertion, the USB icon sometimes spontaneously reappears after a few minutes, but the USB device still does not appear in Windows Explorer. I have exchanged another known-reliable USB data cable, but with the same results.
3. When the HD is removed from the USB enclosure and installed on the IDE primary, Windows Explorer can see the HD with volume name and all files, seemingly intact. When the same HD is returned to the original USB enclosure and a USB data cable inserted, the old symptoms return.
4. When a drive with no (known) problem is installed in the original enclosure, all normal functions return-- Windows Explorer not only recognizes the USB ext HD enclosure with a drive letter, but its volume name and file structure, as well.
Clearly, a data structure critical to USB operation is missing from the original USB enclosure-mounted HD. I have reviewed countless forum posts, but most address boot drive issues, and the relative few that deal with USB ext HDs are usually resolved with mounting the drive to the IDE primary. A few more cases are resolved with chkdsk /f in safe mode, or by running the recovery console with the "R" option on a boot drive.
But I am supercautious about running chkdsk with any switch, since chkdsk mangled data earlier on another HD when the system attempted a chkdsk run automatically to "fix" the volume.
The mystery is simple to define-- if a data structure (MBR, index, FAT, etc.) is missing from the USB ext enclosure-mounted HD, why is the same HD recognized with no apparent problem when installed on the IDE primary? (Of course, the HD is jumpered to master in both cases, with the second internal IDE slaved).
What data structure appears to be missing? How is that structure restored safely and reliably?
|