guru wrote:
Sorry but that is a stupid quote............... A "REAL" high success rate should indicate the competence of the engineers in the company not your "Luck" value
labtech wrote:
Question: let's say a company's real success rate is 99%. If the next drive in-line is yours and it ends up not recoverable. Will the rate success really matter to you at the end of the day?
I find the problem is that success and failure are measured differently.
Does a DOA drive with no surface and a black filter count as unsuccessful for you?
Does a drive that was completely wiped or overwritten with no data to be recovered count as unsuccessful?
Do you crank up the quote so high that the client turns it down on a project that is unlikely recoverable?
I can't speak for others, but we get at least 15-20% of drives in after it is too late. Either because of physical crashes beyond repair or because of the effects of DIY by end users or their technicians.
It really comes down to, what is the percentage of unrecoverable projects by you might be recoverable by someone else? But, who really knows or would want to honestly answer that question?
I can say, with certainty, I have a lab tech who has recovered data from drives that I would have called unrecoverable...and I'm the one who trained him. But, we all see things differently. Sometimes, it just comes down to the value of the recovery and the time and parts needed to recover it.