MANDR wrote:
Being a public forum, where consumers will visit to get recommendations for DR firms, is it not fair that the companies are named?
To me it feels like 95% of the time consumers come to this forum for free DIY info. Experienced members' suggestions to use a professional company is interpreted like plague.
MANDR wrote:
If a company is unable to recover a failed media because it has some irreparable fault, this is unavoidable and unfortunately it happens. If a company is unable to recover it because the job is bigger than them then fair is for the consumers to be aware of this.
It is the customer's job to do proper research about where they send the drive in. On the flip side, I agree with you, a co. should exercise an ethical approach in understanding its limits and if can't handle certain aspects of a recovery, then they should say "sorry, we do not support this particular type of recovery" and decline the job. BUT, again, experience has taught me that customers frequently prefer to research what service is cheaper and sadly NOT which is better and quality oriented, thus leaving room for botched jobs.
MANDR wrote:
If it was my entire collection of photos I lost and I came here looking for a reputable company to help me, what is to stop me sending to Company 'A' who probably botched the job before Company 'B' even got a look in.
Nothing, except maybe a little more research on the the suggestions that have been made. Naturally, nobody will recommend anybody who could not handle the job.
So, I hope this thread will help some inexperienced people in need of data recovery who will think twice about who they are sending their media to.