@xose_maria,
Thanks for confirming that you used USB for the test.
xose_maria wrote:
but will give me performance issues ....
Are you asking "will this drive" (the currently unused Seagate ST9160314AS, whose SMART data you listed at the start of this thread) "give [you] performance issues"? If so then why are you specifically asking about performance (and not reliability, or noise, or anything else)? Do you have a reason why you think the performance from that drive would be abnormal?
IMHO it's not sensible to try to answer any performance questions based on the data supplied so far, since the read throughput graph was collected when the drive was attached via USB.

If you want to test the native throughput of the drive, you need at attach it via (e)SATA and re-run your throughput benchmark.
Is there a reason, which you have not told us yet, why you worry about the performance of this specific Seagate ST9160314AS drive?
Or are you asking about the performance of the drive currently in your laptop (not the drive whose SMART data you listed at the start of the thread)? Please try to be clear - the ambiguities in your comments are becoming confusing.
