MultiDrive – free backup, clone & wipe disk utility from Atola Technology

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: 300GB Seagate SAS ST3300555SS showing as 160MB at post
PostPosted: December 13th, 2012, 16:34 
Offline

Joined: January 23rd, 2010, 16:20
Posts: 248
Location: Data Recovery in Glasgow, Scotland
any ideas?

thanks in advance

andy


Attachments:
sas3.JPG
sas3.JPG [ 394.04 KiB | Viewed 10814 times ]

_________________
Databusters Data Recovery Glasgow
http://www.datarecovery.co.uk/latest-data-recovery-jobs/
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 300GB Seagate SAS ST3300555SS showing as 160MB at post
PostPosted: December 13th, 2012, 16:38 
Offline

Joined: July 18th, 2006, 3:05
Posts: 7476
Location: ITALY
From HP server by a chance (on caddy) ? :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 300GB Seagate SAS ST3300555SS showing as 160MB at post
PostPosted: December 13th, 2012, 16:41 
Offline

Joined: January 23rd, 2010, 16:20
Posts: 248
Location: Data Recovery in Glasgow, Scotland
Dell mate. Got it on an adaptec 1405.

3 disk raid, other 2 cloned fine

_________________
Databusters Data Recovery Glasgow
http://www.datarecovery.co.uk/latest-data-recovery-jobs/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 300GB Seagate SAS ST3300555SS showing as 160MB at post
PostPosted: December 13th, 2012, 16:45 
Offline

Joined: March 28th, 2011, 17:45
Posts: 441
Location: italy
can you read modules / tracks?
did you check them?

1) translator regeneration
2) smart hot swap


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 300GB Seagate SAS ST3300555SS showing as 160MB at post
PostPosted: December 13th, 2012, 16:47 
Offline

Joined: January 23rd, 2010, 16:20
Posts: 248
Location: Data Recovery in Glasgow, Scotland
Quote:
1) translator regeneration
2) smart hot swap


UDMA?

_________________
Databusters Data Recovery Glasgow
http://www.datarecovery.co.uk/latest-data-recovery-jobs/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 300GB Seagate SAS ST3300555SS showing as 160MB at post
PostPosted: December 13th, 2012, 16:49 
Offline

Joined: March 28th, 2011, 17:45
Posts: 441
Location: italy
no way, you need scsi of course.
if you do not have forget to fix that drive...
if it is a raid 5 and you have got 2 drives a bit of luck you can retrieve data..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 300GB Seagate SAS ST3300555SS showing as 160MB at post
PostPosted: December 13th, 2012, 16:51 
Offline

Joined: January 23rd, 2010, 16:20
Posts: 248
Location: Data Recovery in Glasgow, Scotland
need all 3 for this one :(

_________________
Databusters Data Recovery Glasgow
http://www.datarecovery.co.uk/latest-data-recovery-jobs/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 300GB Seagate SAS ST3300555SS showing as 160MB at post
PostPosted: December 13th, 2012, 20:27 
Offline

Joined: August 18th, 2010, 17:35
Posts: 3669
Location: Massachusetts, USA
RAID 0? Little strange...

_________________
Hard Disk Drive (HDD), Solid State Drive (SSD, SATA, NVMe, etc), USB Flash Drive and RAID Data Recovery Specialist in Massachusetts


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 300GB Seagate SAS ST3300555SS showing as 160MB at post
PostPosted: December 13th, 2012, 23:21 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: September 29th, 2005, 12:02
Posts: 3577
Location: Chicago
Could 160 be the connection speed? And maybe you mistakingly think it's the shown capacity?
These drives usually show either full capacity or capacity 0

Not an easy model to deal with

_________________
SAN, NAS, RAID, Server, and HDD Data Recovery.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 300GB Seagate SAS ST3300555SS showing as 160MB at post
PostPosted: December 14th, 2012, 3:53 
Offline

Joined: November 29th, 2006, 10:08
Posts: 7864
Location: UK
buster80 wrote:
need all 3 for this one :(


Why?

Did one of the good ones drop out the raid a while back?

_________________
PC Image Data Recovery
http://www.pcimage.co.uk

New!! HDD-PCB.COM for all your PCB and donor HDD requirements!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 300GB Seagate SAS ST3300555SS showing as 160MB at post
PostPosted: December 14th, 2012, 4:22 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: January 28th, 2009, 10:54
Posts: 3547
Location: Greece
Holy crap!
These drives are a total nightmare to recover (if needed), and as said, you need PC3K SCSI to diagnose and possibly fix. If you need to open them up for head swap etc... well.... you will have to to deal with A LOT of challenges. Better to avoid it.

I say you go ahead and re-cosider the chances of recovery with 2/3 drives.
Ask DR-Kiev to take a look, he will tell you what can be done.

Good luck mate.

_________________
http://www.northwind.gr
SandForce SSD Recovery
Ransomware Reverse Engineering - NoMoreRansom! partners


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 300GB Seagate SAS ST3300555SS showing as 160MB at post
PostPosted: December 14th, 2012, 6:36 
Offline

Joined: January 23rd, 2010, 16:20
Posts: 248
Location: Data Recovery in Glasgow, Scotland
Quote:
Why?

Did one of the good ones drop out the raid a while back?


yea mate

_________________
Databusters Data Recovery Glasgow
http://www.datarecovery.co.uk/latest-data-recovery-jobs/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 300GB Seagate SAS ST3300555SS showing as 160MB at post
PostPosted: December 14th, 2012, 6:38 
Offline

Joined: January 23rd, 2010, 16:20
Posts: 248
Location: Data Recovery in Glasgow, Scotland
Quote:
Ask DR-Kiev to take a look, he will tell you what can be done.


the master craftsman has had his paws on this one already yea :wink:

thanks

andy

_________________
Databusters Data Recovery Glasgow
http://www.datarecovery.co.uk/latest-data-recovery-jobs/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 300GB Seagate SAS ST3300555SS showing as 160MB at post
PostPosted: December 14th, 2012, 7:41 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: January 28th, 2009, 10:54
Posts: 3547
Location: Greece
Then I suggest you outsource this drive to someone who owns a PC3K SCSI mate, no other way 'round it.

_________________
http://www.northwind.gr
SandForce SSD Recovery
Ransomware Reverse Engineering - NoMoreRansom! partners


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 300GB Seagate SAS ST3300555SS showing as 160MB at post
PostPosted: December 14th, 2012, 7:49 
Offline

Joined: January 23rd, 2010, 16:20
Posts: 248
Location: Data Recovery in Glasgow, Scotland
Quote:
Could 160 be the connection speed? And maybe you mistakingly think it's the shown capacity?
These drives usually show either full capacity or capacity 0

Not an easy model to deal with


had a couple 0MB ones too, weird isnt it

will get a screenshot

thanks

andy

_________________
Databusters Data Recovery Glasgow
http://www.datarecovery.co.uk/latest-data-recovery-jobs/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 300GB Seagate SAS ST3300555SS showing as 160MB at post
PostPosted: December 14th, 2012, 7:55 
Offline

Joined: January 23rd, 2010, 16:20
Posts: 248
Location: Data Recovery in Glasgow, Scotland
screenshot


Attachments:
sas5.JPG
sas5.JPG [ 761.2 KiB | Viewed 10730 times ]

_________________
Databusters Data Recovery Glasgow
http://www.datarecovery.co.uk/latest-data-recovery-jobs/
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 300GB Seagate SAS ST3300555SS showing as 160MB at post
PostPosted: December 14th, 2012, 10:01 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: September 29th, 2005, 12:02
Posts: 3577
Location: Chicago
Very interesting
Thank you

_________________
SAN, NAS, RAID, Server, and HDD Data Recovery.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 300GB Seagate SAS ST3300555SS showing as 160MB at post
PostPosted: December 14th, 2012, 11:04 
Offline

Joined: July 18th, 2006, 3:05
Posts: 7476
Location: ITALY
Weird, indeed.

Usually it was a go/no go (0 MB).


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 93 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group