idontknowhatimdoing wrote:
Naturally, the first step I took was to run a chkdsk test.
idontknowhatimdoing wrote:
I decided to further investigate using the SeaTools for Windows.
idontknowhatimdoing wrote:
I then proceeded to run SeaTools for DOS and it performed the Long Test
idontknowhatimdoing wrote:
I did a little bit of research and used a tool called HDAT2 for DOS. I ran the Read Test and...
idontknowhatimdoing wrote:
I then decided to run one final chkdsk ...
idontknowhatimdoing wrote:
My computer is running fine and I haven't suffered any data loss. As a precaution, I have ordered an external hard-drive to back up my data on.
idontknowhatimdoing wrote:
Any advice, I'm quite confused...

[/quote]
My advice is to turn back time, do the LAST step FIRST, backup your data and then
pound your drive with these tests.
It is Ironic that you did the exact oppisite to what you called "Obvious". it should be obvious that testing a drive puts more stress on it than actual use. So stressing it out before you have backed it up is not a good idea. I am not sure what the testing was intened to accomplish. As a good result of a passed test would lead to you not believing it, and doing more testing, and a fail would lead you to doing what you already knew you had to do - backup and toss the drive.
As for brand/model recommendations, you will probably get a for/against for any drive. much better to plan your backup so that if a drive fails it doesnt matter. Any drive can fail, for any reason. add electricity to the mix and any drive can fail at any time - even if it is no fault of the drive.
BTW, the positive thing is you did act on the warning, lot of people wouldnt until they were here asking a different question. It is not always obvious that choices are not good until afterwards.