mediaman wrote:
hmm, thanks a lot! (I'll assume for the purposes of this thread that something got lost in translation)
Actually I am suspecting static produced by the hepa filter set up may be the cause? My whole bench, and me, and chair etc is grounded, but could the airflow have a static charge? I know WD,s in general are very sensitive. I am going to put the heads back on the donor to see how it works. As I say, the head swap went really really well, you would have been proud!

I highly doubt that you did 20 recoveries in a row in the same cleanroom with no issues and then had an issue with static charge. What made you think static charge? Was it not cleaned correctly or were you rubbing it with dry paper towels for extended periods of time prior to the swap?

What happened when you put the parts drive heads back into their original case? Though the sound isn't good, I wouldn't rule out firmware issues; at least if you are positive that your headswap went well. The heads are sensitive but I think with them ramped you could get away with this drive. Alignment is crucial but I've personally pulled headstacks out of many, many WD series hard drives and put them in donors. Then when the swap didn't work I placed them back into their original cases and the heads worked fine with no crazy contraptions or methods. Firmware adaptives are crucial after a swap, instead of the quasi-random guessing of alignment. Does the drive ever "come ready"? Even into it's "safe mode"? What equipment do you have available to you, i.e., firmware manipulation?
BlackST wrote:
No it's not impossible. I have a solution for alignment but unfortunately is rather complicated so it's neither commercially exploitable :S anyway it was a good experiment and worked decently.
Complicated or not, if you're not willing to share why post about it?

I imagine there are some pretty intellectual people on here that might be able to comprehend that intricate details of the task. As well as many who will attempt and fail. I know you've mentioned an NDA on several occasions and that is understandable. But IMO "No it's not impossible" would suffice, instead of talking about methods that can't be shared with others.
