MultiDrive – free backup, clone & wipe disk utility from Atola Technology

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Zerofill before cloning
PostPosted: December 1st, 2008, 6:46 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: November 28th, 2008, 5:20
Posts: 11
Hi. We reuse our target drives when cloning, trying to match the patient drive regarding size to be sure to overwrite all old sectors at the target. There are times when we can not match the drivesizes. For example if a lower capacity drive (40G) needs cloning and the only target we have at hand is very much larger (500G). For these scenarios we always zerofill the target drive before cloning, it works fine but it is time consuming. Is there any other (better) way to make sure that the target drive does not contain data from previous customers? Sending a previous clients files to the new client would be a disaster. Of course if we are able to successfully clone the entire drives and the fs looks fine with no errors and you can access the old partitions right away at the target drive this is not an issue. But we are not that lucky in most cases because you wouldnt need cloning in the first place for these cases.

For cloning we use Atola insight.

:) Kerstin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Zerofill before cloning
PostPosted: December 1st, 2008, 7:37 
Offline

Joined: October 13th, 2008, 7:29
Posts: 1493
Wiping is essential. You can make things easier though. http://www.yec-usa.com/products/geisha.html


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Zerofill before cloning
PostPosted: December 1st, 2008, 8:51 
Offline

Joined: July 18th, 2006, 3:05
Posts: 7476
Location: ITALY
You have 2 common solutions : zero fill sector by sector or using INTERNAL security functions.
I think the best solution is to use a drive maybe larger, but not exaggerately large than the source, i.e. a 80/120 GB for a 40.
Internal erase does not take for a common 160 GB more than 20/30 mins. and only requires power supply, filling makes the computer busy and is longer.
I think there are no other possibilities, EXCEPT one : zerofill a known good drive and "clone" it on the patient. This only if the operation, tested, is significantly faster. Otherwise, I don't see any other way :S


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Zerofill before cloning
PostPosted: December 1st, 2008, 10:11 
Offline

Joined: November 29th, 2006, 10:08
Posts: 7864
Location: UK
Hi

Why not cut the LBA of the target drive to the size of the patient?

_________________
PC Image Data Recovery
http://www.pcimage.co.uk

New!! HDD-PCB.COM for all your PCB and donor HDD requirements!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Zerofill before cloning
PostPosted: December 1st, 2008, 10:42 
Offline

Joined: July 18th, 2006, 3:05
Posts: 7476
Location: ITALY
pcimage wrote:
Hi

Why not cut the LBA of the target drive to the size of the patient?


It's a partial solution : the destination drive should be COMPLETELY FREE from previous data for privacy : if - for any reason - some sectors are skipped from cloning i.e. because of read errors, the destination drive still contain the previous data because the blocks are not overwritten (skipped).
And this is useless, too, because if you have cloned successfully the source disk, the partition boundaries will be copied, too, and this will prevent going beyond them when recovering the files (unless the boundaries are destroyed).
For me, for security reasons and for privacy, data on the destination disk has to be destroyed completely.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Zerofill before cloning
PostPosted: December 1st, 2008, 11:09 
Offline

Joined: September 27th, 2005, 8:21
Posts: 765
Please see this topic :)
zero-fill-recomendations-t10132.html

Also, there will be some more options for zero-filling in the upcoming release (this week) - see picture below.

Attachment:
insight-prepare-destination.PNG
insight-prepare-destination.PNG [ 45.69 KiB | Viewed 8974 times ]


I will look if we can move or copy the security erase functionality into that form as well since it is the most convenient way to zero-fill hard drives.

And, within couple months we will replace the current Insight's imager with the new one that will completely resolve this issue so that you won't have to worry about zero-filling anymore.

_________________
Dmitry


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Zerofill before cloning
PostPosted: December 1st, 2008, 11:33 
Offline

Joined: July 18th, 2006, 3:05
Posts: 7476
Location: ITALY
That's why I have included something like that on my custom-made tools , and I use (and suggest) security erase.... :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Zerofill before cloning
PostPosted: December 1st, 2008, 11:44 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: November 28th, 2008, 5:20
Posts: 11
Thanks!

I guess the best way is as Maysoft suggests. An option to zerofill all sectors at the target drive that has not been involved in the cloning would be a great time saver because you only have to zf parts of the target drive.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Zerofill before cloning
PostPosted: December 1st, 2008, 12:22 
Offline

Joined: November 29th, 2006, 10:08
Posts: 7864
Location: UK
BlackST wrote:
pcimage wrote:
Hi

Why not cut the LBA of the target drive to the size of the patient?


It's a partial solution : the destination drive should be COMPLETELY FREE from previous data for privacy : if - for any reason - some sectors are skipped from cloning i.e. because of read errors, the destination drive still contain the previous data because the blocks are not overwritten (skipped).
And this is useless, too, because if you have cloned successfully the source disk, the partition boundaries will be copied, too, and this will prevent going beyond them when recovering the files (unless the boundaries are destroyed).
For me, for security reasons and for privacy, data on the destination disk has to be destroyed completely.


What I actually meant was cut the LBA, then erase the drive. It would be a hell of a lot quicker to erase a 40Gb (which the drive will think it is) rather than the full 500Gb. ;-)

_________________
PC Image Data Recovery
http://www.pcimage.co.uk

New!! HDD-PCB.COM for all your PCB and donor HDD requirements!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Zerofill before cloning
PostPosted: December 1st, 2008, 16:20 
Offline

Joined: July 18th, 2006, 3:05
Posts: 7476
Location: ITALY
Yes, maybe. It's worth a try.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Zerofill before cloning
PostPosted: December 1st, 2008, 17:46 
Offline

Joined: August 12th, 2008, 13:11
Posts: 3235
Location: USA
pcimage wrote:
What I actually meant was cut the LBA, then erase the drive. It would be a hell of a lot quicker to erase a 40Gb (which the drive will think it is) rather than the full 500Gb. ;-)


Then you get a moderately tech savvy customer or one whose kid likes to play with MHDD... uncuts the drive, recovers previous customer's data... lawsuit time.

_________________
You don't have to backup all of your files, just the ones you want to keep.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Zerofill before cloning
PostPosted: December 1st, 2008, 18:13 
Offline

Joined: August 12th, 2008, 13:11
Posts: 3235
Location: USA
KerstinF wrote:
Thanks!

I guess the best way is as Maysoft suggests. An option to zerofill all sectors at the target drive that has not been involved in the cloning would be a great time saver because you only have to zf parts of the target drive.


You could always make note of what LBA your image stops at and then use MHDD erase on the rest of the drive.

_________________
You don't have to backup all of your files, just the ones you want to keep.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Zerofill before cloning
PostPosted: December 1st, 2008, 19:09 
Offline

Joined: November 29th, 2006, 10:08
Posts: 7864
Location: UK
drccsc wrote:
pcimage wrote:
What I actually meant was cut the LBA, then erase the drive. It would be a hell of a lot quicker to erase a 40Gb (which the drive will think it is) rather than the full 500Gb. ;-)


Then you get a moderately tech savvy customer or one whose kid likes to play with MHDD... uncuts the drive, recovers previous customer's data... lawsuit time.


That's assuming you just give the client the image without checking the data!

Not extract the data,check it and give it to him/her on DVD or another HDD, like any decent pro would.

I think the point being made was not contaminating the data in the (temporary) image with previously existing data. ;-)

_________________
PC Image Data Recovery
http://www.pcimage.co.uk

New!! HDD-PCB.COM for all your PCB and donor HDD requirements!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Zerofill before cloning
PostPosted: December 1st, 2008, 20:28 
Offline

Joined: August 12th, 2008, 13:11
Posts: 3235
Location: USA
My mistake, I misread the original post and thought the poster was giving the reused target drive straight to the customer.

_________________
You don't have to backup all of your files, just the ones you want to keep.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Zerofill before cloning
PostPosted: December 2nd, 2008, 3:42 
Offline

Joined: November 28th, 2004, 1:54
Posts: 319
KerstinF wrote:
Hi. We reuse our target drives when cloning, trying to match the patient drive regarding size to be sure to overwrite all old sectors at the target. There are times when we can not match the drivesizes. For example if a lower capacity drive (40G) needs cloning and the only target we have at hand is very much larger (500G). For these scenarios we always zerofill the target drive before cloning, it works fine but it is time consuming. Is there any other (better) way to make sure that the target drive does not contain data from previous customers? Sending a previous clients files to the new client would be a disaster. Of course if we are able to successfully clone the entire drives and the fs looks fine with no errors and you can access the old partitions right away at the target drive this is not an issue. But we are not that lucky in most cases because you wouldnt need cloning in the first place for these cases.

For cloning we use Atola insight.

:) Kerstin

We have dedicated machines that are used almost expressly for the secure deletion of data before using them as target drives.

As far as I'm concerned, you cannot cut corners. Just do it religiously - you cannot afford to even consider the risks involved of returning a clients's data that may incorporate someone else's "adult" material.

This is one area in which we never, ever compromise.

Duncan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Zerofill before cloning
PostPosted: December 2nd, 2008, 5:02 
Offline

Joined: July 18th, 2006, 3:05
Posts: 7476
Location: ITALY
100% agree with Odiferous.... sometimes drives contain porno stuff that you must wear condoms only to handle them... and you can get AIDS by only reading the file names :D LOL !!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Zerofill before cloning
PostPosted: December 2nd, 2008, 5:34 
Offline

Joined: October 13th, 2008, 7:29
Posts: 1493
BlackST wrote:
100% agree with Odiferous.... sometimes drives contain porno stuff that you must wear condoms only to handle them... and you can get AIDS by only reading the file names :D LOL !!!



LOL


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Zerofill before cloning
PostPosted: December 2nd, 2008, 6:24 
Offline

Joined: November 29th, 2006, 10:08
Posts: 7864
Location: UK
Fortunately DeepSpar has a neat feature to erase ALL unused, or non copied sectors. Even the stuff above the LBA cut.

So it's just a matter of running this through the image to be sure. Takes minutes.

_________________
PC Image Data Recovery
http://www.pcimage.co.uk

New!! HDD-PCB.COM for all your PCB and donor HDD requirements!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Zerofill before cloning
PostPosted: December 3rd, 2008, 19:06 
Offline

Joined: October 3rd, 2005, 0:40
Posts: 4755
Location: Hungary
I usually fill with a known pattern so I can easily identify any unread areas at any time apart from logs and maps

pepe

_________________
Adatmentés - Data recovery


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Zerofill before cloning
PostPosted: December 8th, 2008, 16:34 
Offline

Joined: September 27th, 2005, 9:10
Posts: 220
pepe wrote:
I usually fill with a known pattern so I can easily identify any unread areas at any time apart from logs and maps

pepe


Yep. I use HDAT to wipe drives. By default, it fills drives with the pattern "HDAT" (but you can change it to anything you want).

When I'm done w/ my recovery, I can search files for the contents "HDATHDATHDAT" and find any files that didn't make it.

Fairly quick, and easy.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: shamimdhali and 77 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group