Hi,
masbass wrote:
I just found out that Acronis True Image does just that
http://www.wilderssecurity.com/archive/ ... 82535.htmlActually, Acronis True Image is unlikely to do what your program's copy protection needs, to be "fooled" by a new hard disk.
Although there is some BS in that thread which you linked to, most of the contributors are correct in explaining that there is a difference between a genuine unreadable sector (which is probably what that copy protection is looking for); and having Windows report that the filesystem has some bad sectors (which is just some values set in the filesystem).
The point is that if you do a block-by-block clone of the disk (which has one or more genuine unreadable sectors) using Acronis True Image or Ghost etc., then although Windows will still report there being some amount of bad sectors in the filesystem (as marked in the FAT / NTFS metadata), the actual sectors at those locations would be readable on the new disk. Those programs do not create genuine unreadable sectors (although such programs do exist).
masbass wrote:
and for 50$ it sounds like a reasonable price to try, only problem is it doesn't support Win98 and WinMe (system this prog is running is Win98...). I expect it to have a DOS boot mode where all duplicating will take place but it's not clear. Has anyone tried it and can comment? Thanks
Unless the copy protection scheme is particularly "brain dead", then using True Image / Ghost etc. won't defeat it. To answer your question, True Image (after it has been installed in Windows) allows you to make a bootable CD. So you need to install it on a different machine with a supported OS, make the bootable CD, then you can use that on any PC. But my bet is that this will not work.
Finally, you might be completely genuine, but how do we know that? You might be trying to make lots of copies of this gym software to sell to people...
^-Vulcan-^